Wednesday, July 31, 2013

‘80s Action Week: The Road Warrior (George Miller, 1981)

Although the series would define what so many viewers now think of as “post-apocalyptic,” the first Mad Max was not really a sci-fi film at all. Rather, it was a low-budget gearhead thriller about a loose-cannon Aussie cop who takes on some violent motorcycle gangs. Its director, George Miller, a doctor, had been inspired to make it after spending a little too much time around the emergency room – hence all the random cutaways to eyeballs and the film’s almost clinical fascination with realistic violence.

It was with this second film, known to most of the world simply as Mad Max 2, that director Miller and star Mel Gibson took Max (who lost his wife and child in the earlier film’s shattering finale) and projected him into a post-WWIII future. Now, society had fully crumbled and small, ragged bands of ruthless warriors fought desperately for oil across a bleak desertscape. It was an epic gesture, to be sure, but it wasn’t a particularly grandiose one. I don’t know what kind of budget he was actually working with, but Miller craftily used the natural terrain of Australia to create his science-fiction wasteland. In effect, he did with The Road Warrior what Jean-Luc Godard did with Alphaville, creating a faux-futuristic prism through which to see the present.

It’s odd to think that, at the time, The Road Warrior must have seemed like a crazed fever dream brought on by the geo-political and cultural neuroses of the late 1970s: Gas shortages, Cold War proxy battles, the punk revolution, the rise of nihilistic hedonism, etc. It’s also odd that, given all that topicality, the film did not eventually become a time capsule – its fears and touchstones growing quaint as they receded into the past. (Think of Truffaut’s adaptation of Fahrenheit 451, a lovely movie with a lot to say that has totally dated over the years.)

No, the filmmaking in The Road Warrior is so powerful that the movie basically created its own reality. If anything, Miller’s vision of the world has become the unstated source material for so many other films. Maybe that’s because this director, for all his box office success with this and other films, always had an offbeat sensibility that never quite meshed with his times. (My near-religious fondness for his insanely stylized and strange medical drama Lorenzo’s Oil is well-documented.) He’s not a matter-of-fact action director, but rather a forceful mannerist fond of grand, almost baroque stylistic gestures. How else can one explain Lord Humungus and his murderous BDSM biker gang – still among the weirdest and most disturbing set of action movie villains ever put onscreen? These are not the kinds of figures you’d find in an ordinary action movie, even an ordinary sci-fi movie.

And so, The Road Warrior is a relentless action opera – with movement, emotion, and music building and building to crashing crescendos of violence and catharsis, with little time for the niceties of plot (which would be a problem -- if the film had much of a plot). Years before Coppola and Scorsese went to town with such techniques in films like Bram Stoker’s Dracula and The Age of Innocence, Miller uses a wide range of quaint cinematic trickery -- from silent-movie-style montages to lap dissolves to, at one point, a rabbit’s-eye-view of the action -- to create a world that has almost no real outside referent. Over the years, The Road Warrior has become canonized as a sci-fi wonder, one of the early F/X blockbusters – acclaimed for its stunts, its action, its appropriately terse heroics. All that may be correct, but I don’t think we’ve given George Miller enough credit for how deliriously strange and stylized – how borderline-experimental -- it is.


  1. It is rumoured that George Miller made this film on a budget of $12.97 ... Other than that, I love the Mel Gibson of this era. No-one else in recent screen memory has communicated this much tender macho bravado. You'd have to go back to James Dean or Brando to capture the raw personal presence of Gibson. And then following this work with The Year of Living Dangerously? Amazing ... Too bad he lost the thread.

  2. A lot of this is false. The film was depicted as "the start of the end of the world," as the film itself said,and the central background to the plot was that the central government was dissolving because of resource scarcity and warfare, leaving the the Australian land to the people. Those who still wanted there to be peace and justice formed the "Main Force Patrol" as a last hope for civility. The movie itself was set to take place in the mid 1980's, which was a near future for the year that the movie released in, which was 1979.

    Also, George Miller wrote the script of the film and made it with a rough $2000 budget because of his early life in Australia's gang environment, which is centered around cars and bikes (similar to the bike gangs of the US). He lost many close friends to that crowd, and Mad Max was his own personification of his cooped-up emotions that he always felt. This is the reason why he has a fascination with violence and cars, which is most abundant in his Mad Max films.

  3. It's good but it's not 5 star good.
    Acting was excellent but the fight competition was a little hokey.
    I gave it 4 stars but I'd really rate it about 3 1/2.
    Glad all those 5 star people were so entertained 123movies online but it just doesn't rate up there with the best of the best.