Bernardo Bertolucci’s mesmerizing, towering 1900 is hitting Blu-Ray thanks to Olive Films, and I haven’t been this excited about a release in quite some time.
When I saw it again at MoMA last year, I was quite shaken for some days
afterwards. There’s something about 1900 that puts every other movie to shame –
in its size, scope, and sweep, obviously, but also in the fact that you can’t just
shrug your shoulders at it. It provokes an emotionally violent response,
regardless of whether you love it or hate it. You might even do both. At 317
minutes, there’s a lot of movie in there.
"There used always to be something to say. Now that everyone is agreed, there isn't so much to say."
Showing posts with label 1900. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1900. Show all posts
Saturday, May 5, 2012
Thursday, December 16, 2010
"Remember, Fabrizio, one can't live without Bertolucci..."
These are interesting times. A fantastic Bernardo Bertolucci retrospective started at MoMA yesterday, and Film Forum is about to revive The Conformist for a week. So I will hopefully be finding myself in hog-heaven soon, provided I can find some time to actually attend some of these screenings. I'm also hoping to continue writing about some of his films as the retro proceeds. But first, there's some stuff to say.
Saturday, November 6, 2010
Some Recycled Thoughts on Bertolucci's "Luna" (R.I.P. Jill Clayburgh)
The passing of the great Jill Clayburgh prompted me to think back to what I consider to be her best film, Bernardo Bertolucci's much-maligned, little-seen Luna. I wrote about it some years ago, for a "Forgotten Films" series I did back when I was writing and editing Nerve's film blog The Screengrab. That blog isn't around anymore, and its archive doesn't seem to go too far back, so I hope they won't mind my repurposing my entry on Luna for this purpose. In truth, my piece is not so much about Clayburgh's (excellent) performance as it is about the film itself: But, well, there you go.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


